This entry was posted on January 29, 2007 at 5:24 pm and is filed under Science, The Papers. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Yeah, Patia. The Times magazine can be like that. I only read the top myself. They have done stories on things I’ve written about. I won’t comment on relative quality, but I’ll say I have a better sense of how many hours there are in a day.
Darn, I’d have to subscribe to read the article. So I will glean what I can from the comments. I liked reading the story about your breakfast with Science.
Waiting for Cassowary 
January 29, 2007 at 6:59 pm |
Thanks for the link to that great article, “Unhappy Meals.”
January 29, 2007 at 7:42 pm |
Twelve pages? Forget it.
January 29, 2007 at 7:50 pm |
Yeah, Patia. The Times magazine can be like that. I only read the top myself. They have done stories on things I’ve written about. I won’t comment on relative quality, but I’ll say I have a better sense of how many hours there are in a day.
January 29, 2007 at 8:03 pm |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=diabetes.box.27
February 8, 2007 at 5:59 pm |
Darn, I’d have to subscribe to read the article. So I will glean what I can from the comments. I liked reading the story about your breakfast with Science.